Rebecca by Daphne du Maurier
Review by Elle
Publication information: Virago Press / 30 Jan 2003 / 448 pages
Where I heard about it: This was one of my set book for my Open University course this year but it’s been on my radar for a while.
Spoilers: None. ZIP. Nada. To spoil even a little would be to ruin the suspense!
Review:
“Last night I dreamt I went to Manderley again.”
Working as a lady’s companion, the heroine of Rebecca learns her place. Life begins to look very bleak until, on a trip to the South of France, she meets Maxim de Winter, a handsome widower whose sudden proposal of marriage takes her by surprise. She accepts, but whisked from glamorous Monte Carlo to the ominous and brooding Manderley, the new Mrs de Winter finds Max a changed man. And the memory of his dead wife Rebecca is forever kept alive by the forbidding Mrs Danvers.
Not since Jane Eyre has a heroine faced such difficulty with the Other Woman.
I can confidently say that I have never once converted so many people to wanting to read a novel using nothing more than my Goodreads status updates. Furthermore, I can absolutely say that I haven’t read a single novel this year which has so completely lived up to its potential in the way that Rebecca has and, let me tell you, this year has been the year of good books so that’s really saying something.
“I do love you,” I said. “I love you dreadfully and I’ve been crying all night because I thought I should never see you again.”
When I said this, I remember he laughed and stretched his hand across the breakfast table. “Bless you for that,” he said; “one day, when you reach that exhalted age of thirty-six which you told me was your ambition, I’ll remind you of this moment. And you won’t believe me. It’s a pity you have to grow up.”
Rebecca had been on my wish list for what seemed like forever; it was one of those novels that I just never quite got around to. My interest was piqued earlier this year, however, by some intense research into JM Barrie (the author of Peter Pan for anyone not quite up on their British literary traditions) and his involvement in the du Maurier family (indeed, Daphne du Maurier called JM Barrie “Uncle Jim”). In all of the literature that I’d waded through in my quest to illuminate something real and tangible about Barrie, I kept tripping over the wan and distant figure of Daphne du Maurier, finding hint after hint of her troubled life and the way in which she achieved catharsis through her novels (something which somewhat disturbingly mirrors Barrie’s idea of catharsis). I am not, it has to be said, someone who is vastly invested in authorial intentions when I read novels – what the author intended doesn’t matter all that much after the novel and its ideas become the property of its readers – but I must confess to having a small obsession with dearest Daphne, so when Rebecca turned up on my set books list for my 20th century literature class, I just about jumped up and down on the spot.
It would be impossible for Daphne du Maurier not to doff her cap to Charlotte Brontë in the telling of Rebecca; the intertextual links to Jane Eyre and the original tale of The Other Woman linger softly around the edges of the novel from the first page and converge like a smog on the tale as we claw ourselves nearer to the end. Readers are immediately catapulted into the quasi-confident first-person narrative – which is almost unwaveringly delivered by our disturbingly permanently-nameless narrator – and astute lovers of the nineteenth-century novels that are du Maurier’s inheritance will here find the tenacity of Jane Eyre herself becoming muddled with the naïveté of Catherine Morland, the bumbling, socially inept protagonist of Austen’s Northanger Abbey . While we’re on the subject of genre-inheritance, I think it would be equally impossible not to regard Max de Winter in his full context as allusions to Pride and Prejudice, Wuthering Heights and Jane Eyre shadow his every word (and what steamy and dark words they are, I was in love from the first page and willing to believe anything he told me, even if that included that martians inhabited Manderley and made the tea). Du Maurier draws on the aloofness of Darcy, the wit and cheek of Rochester and the brooding violence of Heathcliff to create the menacing, gloomy figure of the Bryonic hero that our narrator so completely falls for.
What du Maurier does achieve is a glorious reinvention of the Gothic. Readers of classics like Frankenstein and Treasure Island will revel in the pervading air of menace that exists in Manderley, shadowy halls delivering bumps and squeaks, surprise servant corridors where you least expect them, rooms untouched since the last Mrs de Winter sat in them, rain coats carrying perfumed scents. Indeed, the word “Manderley” itself seems to have so firmly fixed itself in our cultural consciousness that we are able to recall it mythic surrounds as quickly as we are Pemberley and Thornfield. Lovers of the more recent works of Kate Morton which take place around mysterious locations (The House at Riverton, The Forgotten Garden) will enjoy discovering the secrets of Manderley and will probably be able to make more Beauty and the Beast allusions when it comes to an entire wing being shut up and dark.
This was a woman’s room, graceful, fragile, the room of someone who had chosen every particle of furniture with great care so that each chair, each vase, each small, infintesimal thing should bee in harmony with one another, and with her own personality. It was as though she who had arranged this room had said: “This I will have, and this, and this,” taking piece by piece from the treasures of Manderley each object that pleased her best, ignoring the second-rate, the mediocre, laying her hand with sure certain instinct only upon the best.
To say that Daphne du Maurier draws on other sources of inspiration for her novel is not, of course, to say that it is not original in its own way. Each character follows their own personal path in their search for identity and the role of women and gender expectations are just as fully explored, demolished and built up again. There is a cast of truly unforgettable supporting characters, which is an achivement in itself and something I love to see in any novel but particularly nineteenth-century and twentieth-century novels because it seems that contemporary novels have a hard time of making them seem like anything other than bit-pieces to show how good the protagonist is (also, Frank stole my heart). Rebecca is also a manifesto, a view of the ever-changing fragility and of the superficial and blatantly surface relationships particularly typical of the 1920s and, curiously, of the 2000s.
In short, Rebecca is a jewel in the crown of twentieth-century literature: it manages to deliver that which what readers crave most and that which they don’t expect, all at the same time. It is recommended for anyone who is sick of formulaic romantic fiction and wants to sit on the edge of their seat clutching their throat for the entire ride.
My top ten list just keeps getting better.
10 decadent chocolate bon-bons: The best-of-the-best.
(For more rating information see here.)
























