Archive for July, 2011

July 31, 2011

Book Babble: IMM the Review Edition!

In My Mailbox (IMM) is a weekly feature organised by The Story Siren. IMM is a post where you can show which books entered your house and it also gives you a chance to say thank you to the people that kindly sent them. To find out more about how you can join in click here.

Books I mentioned in this IMM:
Miss Peregrine’s Home for Peculiar Children by Ransom Riggs | Goodreads | Wonderful book trailer! | UK Book Tours
Pictures of Lily by Paige Toon | Goodreads | Lucy in the Sky review
Chasing Daisy by Paige Toon | Goodreads | Lucy in the Sky review
Sworn Sword by James Aitcheson | Goodreads
Cavalier Queen by Fiona Mountain | Goodreads
The Girl is Murder by Katheryn Miller Haines | Goodreads
Heavenly by Jennifer Laurens | Goodreads
Eragon by Christopher Paolini | Goodreads
Eldest by Christopher Paolini | Goodreads
Brisingr by Christopher Paolini | Goodreads
Sister Mischief by Laura Goode | Goodreads

People I mentioned in this IMM:
UK Book Tours
BookAngel_Emma @ Twitter
Carly @ Twitter
Splendidbird @ Twitter

July 29, 2011

Book Babble: Elle, the quick update thereof!

Warning: This gets incredibly mooshy in the end.

Lots of people this week have been asking where I have gone, so this is a quick update video to keep you all up to speed. I stand by everything I say about the blogging community at the end of this video because you are all awesome.

People mentioned are:
Rosy @ The Review Diaries
Emma @ Bookangel Booktopia
Vivienne @ Serendipity Reviews
Daphne @ Loving Books
Zoë @ The Zoë-Trope
Susan @ Susan K Mann.com
Catherine @ Catherine Haines.com

July 26, 2011

Review: The Day Before by Lisa Schroeder

The Day Before by Lisa Schroeder

Review by Elle

Publication Information: Simon Pulse / 28 Jun 2011 / 320 pages

Where I heard about it: I genuinely don’t remember. Presumably I spotted it on Amazon or Goodreads, recognised Lisa’s name, preordered it and then… absolutely forgot about it because when it arrived I remembered nothing of the premise and was surprised to see it. I consider this a win!

Spoilers: A bit more detail than there is in the blurb, so if you want to go into this completely unspoiled then now is the time to hit the red X.

Reviews:

Amber’s life is spinning out of control. All she wants is to turn up the volume on her iPod until all of the demands of family and friends fade away. So she sneaks off to the beach to spend a day by herself.

Then Amber meets Cade. Their attraction is instant, and Amber can tell he’s also looking for an escape. Together they decide to share a perfect day: no pasts, no fears, no regrets.

The more time that Amber spends with Cade, the more she’s drawn to him. And the more she’s troubled by his darkness. Because Cade’s not just living in the now—he’s living each moment like it’s his last.

If you take the blurb for The Day Before at face value – as I admittedly did – then Lisa Schroeder’s latest offering somewhat superficially sounds like a novel about split-second teenage attraction and a boy who is perhaps contemplating suicide. In which case, I have to unequivocally say the following: YOU ARE SO WRONG. So wrong that if wronger was legitimately a word then I might be telling you that you are even wronger than wrong right now. Wrongy wrongy wrong wrong. (I think I might have even lapsed into a disturbing cross between Luna Lovegood and Parker from Leverage in my unmitigated glee at discovering this novel.) I have never read anything by Lisa before and after finishing The Day Before, I had to honestly ask myself why the hell not?

There is a certain aura surrounding novels in verse in the blogosphere. I have found that they either provoke an overflow of enthusiasm or they incite a quiet sort of derision that no one openly admits to. Having only ever read two YA novels in verse (The Day Before being my second positive experience), I’ve heard both sides of the argument and I can admit to finding merits in either side. My first verse novel was Unlocked (which I haven’t reviewed only because I was busy that month) and its subject matter very much leant itself to verse but I was far more worried about a contemporary YA love story than I was about Unlocked and the people in Camp Blah encapsulated my worries with their cries of easy wins, not really poetry, not really a novel and lots of white space. I was concerned that The Day Before wouldn’t have much depth and I was worried I’d buzz through it in an hour and think that the £9.53 I spent to get the hardback copy would be wasted…

I was also wrong wrongy wrong wrong. So wrong, that I wouldn’t have believed it.

In thinking back on reading The Day Before, I’d say that I that it didn’t feel like a novel but rather, it had the effect of one lengthy but very contained, perfect piece of poetry in that it was simple, elegant and emotionally devastating. Lisa Schroeder has mastered the delicacy of wordplay with the pin-point precision of a veteran short story writer, wasting not a single syllable on mindless frivolity but, instead, making every single one of them mean something. Would I have liked it to be longer? For the first time in a long time, my unequivocal answer to that is no. Absolutely not. It is Lisa’s discernment in choosing specific words and packing them full of scent and sound and sensation that makes The Day Before so self-encapsulated in its perfection.

From a technical perspective, it was enjoyable to watch words play on the page, dropping off the end, dancing around in the word “glitter” and quickening into hard beats with the hammering of the protagonists’ hearts. From an emotional perspective, I fell in love with Cade and Amber at the beach. I felt electrified along with the jellyfish, I mourned the loss of the damp sand, I wished for the smell of the ocean and the wind on my face and I cried when Cade wrapped himself up in the feel of the sea and distanced himself from Amber’s worry. I cried when I realised that, for Amber, the ocean is all about saying hello and, ultimately, about saying goodbye.

It’s so difficult to say anything about the plot of The Day Before without giving away some of its suspense and its twists and the way that it can lead you down eight different paths before you ultimately arrive upon the truth and realise that the truth is a fallacy and all that really exists that’s worth caring about exists on a beach that both of these teens are compelled to visit and forced to leave. The novel is narrated from Amber’s point of view but that somehow brought me ingeniously closer to Cade than I would have been had he narrated half of it himself.

It’s also hard to sit down at the end of the novel and try to fit all of the thoughts I had about The Day Before into one simple review because I’m still having thoughts now, two days later. I’m still looking back on it and going, “Oh! I now know what that meant!” and I’m still thinking about poor, damaged Cade and the lack of choices that Amber has. More than anything else, I would say that the merit of a novel is how long it stays with you. I think The Day Before will stay with me for a long time.

For a moment
the air is pretty,
sparkly,
and full of wonder

But in a breath,
it’s over.
He flicks off the light,
leaving us in darkness.

“Was it as thrilling as you thought?”

      ”It was over too soon,” I whisper.      

And now I really want Chasing Brooklyn. Dammit, Lisa Schroeder! I’m on a book buying ban. Do you hear me? BAN. (Whimper.)

7 double-stuff oreos: A book that comes with high recommendations.

(For more rating information see here.)

July 25, 2011

Review: Lucy in the Sky by Paige Toon

Lucy in the Sky by Paige Toon

Review by Elle

Publication Information: Pocket Books / 19 Apr 2007 / 400 pages

Where I heard about it: Lucy in the Sky popped up several times on my Goodreads list in one of those instances of Person A adds it and Persons B, C, D and E are like, “OH! Shiny! Gimme!” and then they add it, too and you’re just compelled to click and check it out because you’ll feel left out if you don’t. (In other words: it was peer pressure, I tell you!)

Spoilers: De nada.

Review:

A lawyer. A surfer. A 24-hour flight.

The frequent liar points are clocking up and Lucy’s got choices to make…

It,s been nine years since Lucy left Australia. Nine years since she’s seen her best friend Molly, and Sam, the one-time love of her life. Now her two friends are getting married. To each other. And Lucy is on her way to Sydney for their wedding. Life for Lucy has moved on. She’s happily living in London with James, her hunky lawyer boyfriend, and has a glamorous job in PR. She’s looking forward to a nice relaxing two-week holiday in Sydney. But just before take-off, Lucy receives a text from James’s mobile. She can’t resist taking a look — and, in one push of a button, her perfect world falls apart…

Contrary to popular belief, I love chick-lit. A lot. I am, however, justifiably very hard on chick-lit as a whole. There are numerous examples out there of well-written, high-quality books in the genre (Rachel’s Holiday! Unsticky!) but it is so difficult right now to find the gems in amongst all of the thigh-high piles of dross-laden plotlines, purple prose and earth-shattering moments of insta-love. Somewhere in the past five years or so, I feel like contemporary chick-lit as a whole has lost its way a little, following blindly in the path of Cecilia Ahern and her magical realism (except in order to suspend disbelief in the face of this magical realism, one would have to stand on one’s head whilst reading the book upside down and simultaneously making time turn backwards).

What a treat it was, then, to discover Paige Toon! There is a blurb on the inside cover of Lucy in the Sky from Lisa Jewell (and though I had never heard of Lisa, it transpires that she is apparently the author of several chick-lit novels of her own) which heralded the novel as, “Real old-school chick-lit, like they used to make in the good old days!” – Lisa Jewell couldn’t have been more right and I am so glad that I took the chance on picking this one up.

The nasty fluorescent light in the bathroom flickers on. I clock my diamond earrings in my reflection and seriously consider tearing them from my ears and flushing them down the toilet. Ha! Knowing how the bastard lied through his teeth to me, they’re probably not even real. Lucy in the sky with cubic fucking zirconia. That’d be about right.

There are too many things I could squee about in this novel and none of them would necessarily be very coherent, however, there are two very important things which make this story the kind of spectacular tour de force which will make me press-gang Kate into reading it and have me giving a copy to everybody I know: 1) the witty, vulnerable, and blithely sarcastic narrative voice and 2) the way that Paige Toon absolutely defies convention and refuses to shy away from the emotional body punches of the situation even when they don’t make Lucy particularly sympathetic.

Lucy is a twenty-something and her voice rings completely true as someone newly entering adulthood, still young enough to remember bitterly the disappointment of teenage unrequited love and only just in her first serious relationship (and desperate not to lose it at any cost). She has these wonderful moments of realising that all is not quite right with her boyfriend, James, but being too emotionally immature and inexperienced to deal with it and so she becomes moody and seemingly irrationally tetchy – she is able to articulate to the reader why she feels the way she feels and yet she is powerless to change her actions. I loved that Lucy was not emotionally perfect or spectacularly pretty and neither was she an over-achiever, or ridiculously intelligent. She is quite simply an average person like the rest of us, armed with serious self-esteem issues which are buried just far enough under the surface so as to cause problems but not so pressing so as to make her a whiny ball of angst (I’m looking at you, paranormal romance).

The next morning when I wake up again just in time to catch the sunrise, I allow myself half an hour of thinking about Nathan, wondering what he’s doing, what could have been. I’m lost in my sad thought as the sun grows bigger and brighter in the sky, but when James appears from the bedroom I tell myself that’s it for the day. I try to keep my daydreaming to a minimum on the way to work, and the next morning, I allow myself just ten minutes of feeling lonely and depressed before I force myself to buck up.

Love triangles are something which I used to love as they were ever-so-slightly taboo, however, they are the oil to the gears of chick-lit these days (and every other genre right now – I’m still looking at you, paranormal romance) so it was an absolute delight to me to see a love triangle which is emotionally honest and which concludes in a way that shocked me, troubled me and made me think. It’s impossible for me to tell you exactly how things work out without spoiling the plot but sufficed to say, Paige Toon doesn’t back off from making Lucy take responsibility for the choices she makes, both the good, the bad and the utterly selfish ones. I was taken aback by the final choice Lucy made and I return again to the phrase emotional honesty because it isn’t the easy choice and it isn’t the one that makes Lucy come up smelling of roses.

Another one of the things that I enjoyed about the book was that all of the characters in the novel are fleshed out properly. I felt like I knew them all, like this was a book in a series where every character got a look in at the action. James, Lucy’s boyfriend, is perfectly rendered as both black and white and Nathan, the other man, is not faultless and beautiful but attractive and flawed. Lucy’s friends were not all yes-men, nor were they always there when she needed them, and past relationships were not skimmed over. I particularly enjoyed Lucy’s relationship with her mother, who is beautifully portrayed as someone who loves Lucy and yet someone who is selfish enough to encourage Lucy to do the things which will give her an easy life, things which are not always to Lucy’s benefit.

I think again, not for the first time, about leaving James. But what then? Where on earth would I go? What would I do? I do love him. He made an effort to bring me over here to be with him this weekend and I know he loves me too. I adore our flat. My job is brilliant. […] I look down at my phone again. But I miss you, I think. And I miss Sam and Molly, my oldest friends. And Sydney with its crystalline waters, jagged skyline and sunsets so beautiful that they make your heart sing.

I’ve never felt so torn.

It would be remiss of me not to tell you the one thing which I think could have been better in the novel and that is that it could be about fifty pages shorter. Toon portrays a wonderfully portrait of painful real life but this portrait also includes one too many workplace events (Lucy works for a mid-list public relations firm) and one too many trips to other locales (such as visiting her mother and going on day trips around London). While these things are a blisteringly real (and frustratingly genuine) portrayal of the ways in which life denies you instant gratification, it made me a little grumpy as reader to get to page 300 and find that there were still another 80 pages to go waiting for Lucy to decide. I don’t think they were badly written pages, just that they were a little superfluous to the plot.

It was really difficult for me to rate this one (especially as two of Toon’s other novels appeared on my doorstep this morning) and it was initially going to be a 7 but the more I think about it, the more fond I grow of it, and the less able I am to give it anything less than an 8.

8 frosted doughnuts: If it’s a series, you want more, if its a stand-alone, you’re sad it stood alone!

(For more rating information see here.)

July 24, 2011

Book Babble: IMM the LGBT Edition!

Books I showed you this week:
You Belong to Me by Karen Rose | Goodreads
The Stranger You Seek by Amanda Kyle Williams | Goodreads
She Loves You, She Loves You Not by Julie Anne Peters | Goodreads
Sean Griswold’s Head by Lindsey Levitt | Goodreads
Blindsided by Priscilla Cummings | Goodreads
Stealing Heaven by Elizabeth Scott | Goodreads
The Vast Fields of Ordinary by Nick Burd | Goodreads
Leaving Paradise by Simone Elkeles | Goodreads
The Bermudez Triangle by Maureen Johnson | Goodreads
Dreams of Significant Girls by Cristina Garcia | Goodreads
Paradise by Jill S. Alexander | Goodreads

July 23, 2011

Announcement: Zoë Marriott Week!

Theme Week: Zoë Marriott Week

Us gals at The Book Memoirs are pleased to announce that Monday 8th August 2011 – Friday 12th August 2011 will be Zoë Marriott Week here on the blog!

For those of you who haven’t heard of Zoë, she is the author of the YA fantasies The Swan Kingdom and Daughter of the Flames, as well as the brand spanking new Shadows on the Moon which was released July 2011 from Walker Books. You can find more information about our lovely guest here on her website or on her blog, The Zoë-Trope.

The program for the week is as follows:

Monday 8th: Zoë gives us her insider knowledge on the Shadows on the Moon trailer and we investigate the casting and production process, as well as giving you the chance to submit a question to Zoë to be answered on Friday!
Tuesday 9th: Elle will give us her thoughts on Zoë’s latest novel, Shadows on the Moon, and we’ll be giving away a copy of the book and some delightful book swag!
Wednesday 10th:  Zoë shares her a very special post telling us all about her favourite comfort reads, stuffed full of recommendations and must-grabs.
Thursday 11th:  Elle and Kate will post their mini-reviews of Daughter of the Flames and The Swan Kingdom and Kate will show off her random knowledge with some interesting facts about fairytales.
Friday 12th: Zoë will answer the reader questions which have been submitted throughout the week and we’ll be offering another extra-special giveaway!

We’re really excited to work with Zoë, she’s an awesome person and a brilliant novelist. Be aware, we’re out to convert you!

See you on Monday 8th August 2011!

July 21, 2011

Review: Imaginary Girls by Nova Ren Suma

Imaginary Girls by Nova Ren Suma

Review by Elle

Publication Information: Dutton Books / 14 Jun 2011 / 352 pages

Genre: Contemporary & Speculative Fiction YA

Where I heard about it: If you haven’t heard about this book already then you’ve been living under a rock.

Spoilers: The first twist in the tale is revealed but given the twist happened at around page 50, it’s not that much of a loss.

Review:

Chloe’s older sister, Ruby, is the girl everyone looks to and longs for, who can’t be captured or caged. When a night with Ruby’s friends goes horribly wrong and Chloe discovers the dead body of her classmate London Hayes left floating in the reservoir, Chloe is sent away from town and away from Ruby.

But Ruby will do anything to get her sister back, and when Chloe returns to town two years later, deadly surprises await. As Chloe flirts with the truth that Ruby has hidden deeply away, the fragile line between life and death is redrawn by the complex bonds of sisterhood.

I can only liken the experience of Imaginary Girls to reading a bind-up of two completely different novels featuring the same cast: the protagonists might overlap but the plotlines have absolutely nothing to do with each other and the two halves of the whole must be treated entirely separately in order to do either of them justice. You see, in my head, Imaginary Girls is split into BL and AL – that is Before London and After London – and I can only but honestly confess that I wish the entire After London portion had never, ever happened.

The first section of the book, Before London, takes place in the world of gripping contemporary fiction. We are introduced to Chloe, a girl who initially seems to hardly exist on the page. She is the shadow of her older sister, the compelling Ruby, and she does whatever Ruby asks her to do, believes whatever Ruby tells her to believe and loves whatever Ruby loves with a kind of unquestioning dogmatic obsession which is in turns both slightly disturbing and downright eerie. This plotline – that of the manic, compelling older sister – is hardly original and yet I found myself absolutely swept up by the first-person narrative voice. I felt like I was in a French noir film with its hazy sun-bleached descriptions and its bare, compelling atmosphere. Everything was indistinct and faintly corrupt, all tainted by a single incident – that of a dead girl, a girl who seemingly committed suicide – an incident which pervades the entire book.

Ruby said I’d never drown – not in a deep ocean, not by shipwreck, not even by falling drunk into someone’s bottomless backyard pool. She said she’d seen me hold my breath underwater for minutes at a time, but to hear her tell it you’d think she meant days. Long enough to live down there if needed, to skim the seafloor collecting shells and shiny soda caps, looking up every so often for the rescue lights, even if they took forever to come.

The character of Chloe is ingeniously rendered. I believed every single word that she said, finding myself blinking dimly, fuzzily at the page when another untruth was discovered and I started to realise that Chloe, in all her glory, did exist, she simply didn’t want to. It is revealed fairly early in the Before London section of the book (so much so that it’s not a huge spoiler) that Chloe is in an endangered position, that she lives with an alcoholic mother and that she spends all of her time subsumed by Ruby’s influence. Ruby’s own glaringly bipolar behaviour is a result of her own abuse, of her own scars rendered by her mother’s erratic behaviour, and yet she is almost the sole caretaker of Chloe. There is an absolutely spectacular scene when Ruby feels compelled to go across state to where Chloe has been returned to her father and Chloe remarks that she has turned up in a stained nightdress because she was on her way to the mailbox in the morning when she suddenly! decided! it would be the best! idea! ever! and not once does Chloe question the oddity of this event.

I absolutely loved the book in its existence Before London.

Just weeks into living at my dad and stepmother’s housein Pennsylvania, my mom mailed me a package. She was sober again and must have realized she should show a stab at missing me, for, I guess, my sake. But the box wasno attempt at amends. It was more a junk drawer than acare package: a spilled cache of feathers and beads from the craft store in town where she worked weekends; a rockfrom, I figured, the Millstream, dusted in our town’s dried mud; some menstrual tea (seriously?); a dog-eared book on power animals (hers was the sparrow, she said, which she’d also taken on as her new name; Ruby said it was actually the vampire bat); and nothing whatsoever from Ruby.

You might say my mom was harmless if you didn’t know any better.

Then After London happened. After London takes place in the hazy space between supernatural and speculative fiction, the place where all of your standard assumptions go to die and your hopes of a compellingly distinct contemporary young adult novel commit hari kari in despair. Somewhere around page 70, Chloe attends a party in a remote quarry, having been convinced to run away from the safety of her father’s home and return to Ruby’s crushed stained-glass view of the world and… she finds herself speaking to the very dead girl – the now-infamous London – whom Chloe herself found stone dead only chapters before, floating around in a boat in the Before London section of the novel. What was a contemporary young adult novel with a unique voice and an atmosphere which thrillingly reminded me of some Australian fiction in its sparseness and confidence suddenly became something which seemed like a strange attempt to shoehorn the novel’s story into the already bulging and overburdened supernatural market.

I suppose it’s impossible at this point not to address the hype for this book. Imaginary Girls is one of two novels which stand out to me this year as being as heavily marketed as it is possible for young adult fiction to be – both Imaginary Girls and The Unbecoming of Mara Dyer have featured on almost every waiting for, anticipating, or on my radar-type post since their announcement late last year/early this year. It’s curious, then, that I now hear more mixed reviews about these two novels since their release than the ten other novels which are/were anticipated but haven’t been as fiercely marketed (Hourglass and Lola and the Boy Next Door come to mind). Others have said it better than me so I’ll leave it to them to discuss hype as a marketing tool and hone to my point: at no point in any of the materials I saw for Imaginary Girls (press releases, blurbs, excerpts) did I ever see any mention of Speculative Fiction. My hopes were ridiculously high for the novel as a contemporary title and I think I would have been rating it as high as a nine had the voice remained consistent and the genre remained the same but…

As Speculative Fiction, Imaginary Girls falls down on a number of different fronts and it would take too long to sit and list all of the minor quibbles I had with it. Once I had put it down and separated the genres in my head, I found that the actual function of the plot in the novel is a little too X-Files-esque to really pack the full punch that it tries to build to and, in the end, I lost faith in the narrative and found myself trailing to the end in frustration.

All in all, I come to the conclusion that I’m upset about Imaginary Girls. I’m upset, I’m frustrated and I’m glad I’m giving the novel, in all its pristine condition, away to someone who will love it better because it would only sit there in all of its beautiful blue glory, taunting me from a shelf and telling me that it all could’ve been so different.

5 sour gummy straws: A book with some definite issues.

(For more rating information see here.)

July 19, 2011

Guest Blogger Week: Grand Prize Winner

Guest Blogger Week: Grand Prize Winner

The winner of the grand prize of seven books of their choice from those featured on our Guest Blogger Week is…

#3 Book Angel Emma

Congratulations, there’s an email on its way!

July 19, 2011

Review: Water for Elephants by Sara Gruen

Water for Elephants by Sara Gruen

Review by Kate

Publication information: Algonquin Books / 9 April 2007 / 335 pages

Genre: Literary fiction

Where I heard about it: In 2007, after nearly a year of reading literally nothing, I asked friends for book recommendations as I wanted to start reading again. Elle claims she was the first to recommend Water for Elephants, but as I thought someone else did, I will say it had multiple good reviews from friends. And then it sat on my shelf. For four years.

Spoilers: Nothing to write home about.

Review:

Though he may not speak of them, the memories still dwell inside Jacob Jankowski’s ninety-something-year-old mind. Memories of himself as a young man, tossed by fate onto a rickety train that was home to the Benzini Brothers Most Spectacular Show on Earth. Memories of a world filled with freaks and clowns, with wonder and pain and anger and passion; a world with its own narrow, irrational rules, its own way of life, and its own way of death. The world of the circus: to Jacob it was both salvation and a living hell.

I’ve never been “into” the circus. My godmother happily retells the story of taking me along with her three daughters to the circus when I was about four. While they ate peanuts and cheered at feats of daring, I fell asleep for almost the entire show. Maybe that’s part of why it took me so long to read Water for Elephants, because on paper it should be a book I adore: the story of down-on-his-luck Jacob who, nowhere else to go, ends up the vet for a circus, all of it told by Jacob as an old man when the circus comes to town. I wish I’d had the sense to read the prologue about four years ago, because the excitement and mystery that is set up on those first few pages is a vein carried through the whole book. Gruen’s prose is beautiful and addicting. Jacob, even more so.

Uncle Al is a buzzard, a vulture, an eater of carrion. Fifteen years ago he was the manager of a mud show: a ragtag group of pellagra-riddled performers dragged from town to town by miserable thrust-hoofed horses.

In August 1928, through no fault of Wall Street, the Benzini Brothers Most Spectacular Show on Earth collapsed. They simply ran out of money and couldn’t make the jump to the next town, never mind back to winter quarters. The general manager caught a train out of town and left everything behind – people, equipment, and animals.

Uncle Al had the good fortune to be in the vicinity.

It’s hard for me to really sort out how I feel about this book. It almost feels like a good ensemble drama, told specifically through the eyes of just one of the players: through Jacob we learn about Uncle Al, the manager who maybe is only out for himself; August, the charismatic but dangerous ringmaster; Kinko, the performing dwarf with a Jack Russel named Queenie; Marlena, the beautiful equestrian performer; Camel and the other men who do the grunt work. Circus life isn’t glorified in the way we’re set up to think of when we tell kids they can run off and join the circus if they don’t want to brush their teeth or eat their brussel sprouts. Everything Jacob experiences is shared through the lens of someone who never expected this life, and you get to feel the horror: in animal abuse, in the mistreatment of other workers, in the bombastic and oftentimes unconscionable ways the circus is run. Jacob is a compassionate lens through which to see some of the least compassionate characters I’ve ever read – and an honest lens.

An honest lens to an extent. Jacob is the sort of unreliable narrator who you trust the entire way through. He’s not really lying, as much as he’s leaving things out. Hinting at things without saying them. Ensuring that you never really know what’s going to happen next, even when you think you do. Gruen perfectly constructs Jacob so you never know if the obvious answer, the one you’d guess from the line of the narrative, is actually the right one. But you trust him, and you believe in him – and you aren’t really disappointed by him, either.

And what started slowly, as a tale about life in the circus that was interesting but not riveting, turned quickly into a story about love and trust and humanity in a way that I can’t really spell out without spoiling the whole book – and writing an ode to Rosie, the most compelling character of all.

Age is a terrible thief. Just when you’re getting the hang of life, it knocks your legs out from under you and stoops your back. It makes you ache and muddies your head and silently spreads cancer throughout your spouse.

Metastatic, the doctor said. A matter of weeks or months. But my darling was as frail as a bird. She died nine days later. After sixty-one years together, she simply clutched my hand and exhaled.

It seems a misnomer to call Water for Elephants a love story, though every review and blurb I’ve read is dead-set on pinning the label through every page. Water for Elephants is a life story. There’s a love element in it, sure, but that’s because there’s love in life. But there’s hurt and fear, danger and despair, all beautifully told in a way that gave me that heart-sick feeling when I finished it, the one where I wished there was more. But on the other hand, I think more would’ve been wrong. I think it stays as everything Jacob needed to say and have understood about his life. And it ended up being exquisite.

9 strawberry shortcakes: A stunner. Well-executed.

(For more rating information see here.)

July 18, 2011

Review: Perfect Chemistry by Simone Elkeles

Perfect Chemistry by Simone Elkeles

Review by Elle

Publication Information: Simon & Schuster Children’s / 1 Apr 2010 / 368 pages

Where I heard about it: I read a review over at The Book Smugglers during work hours because I was horribly. terribly. bored. Two days later I had Perfect Chemistry in my hands and mere hours after starting, Rules of Attraction was winging its way to me and I’d pre-ordered Chain Reaction.

Spoilers: No more than you’d get on the Amazon or Goodreads blurbs.

Review:

When Brittany Ellis walks into chemistry class on the first day of senior year, she has no clue that her carefully created “perfect” life is about to unravel before her eyes. Forced to be lab partners with Alex Fuentes, a gang member from the other side of town, Brittany finds herself having to protect everything she’s worked so hard for – her flawless reputation, her relationship with her boyfriend and, most importantly, the secret that her home life is anything but perfect. Alex is a bad boy and he knows it. So when he makes a bet with his friends to lure Brittany into his life, he thinks nothing of it. But the closer Alex and Brittany get to each other the more they realise that sometimes appearances can be deceptive and that you have to look beneath the surface to discover the truth.

On Wesnesday, Kate reviewed Perfect Chemistry and gave it a six-mini Milky Ways out of ten (it’s sentences like that which make me love our ratings system). I am here to disagree with her.

Occasionally I have a complicated relationship with a book. You know, the way you have a complicated relationship with sugar in that you know it’s inherently bad for you but nothing’s exactly stopping you shovelling another half-slab of Dairy Milk Chocolate into your waiting, drool-covered cake-cave? I love Perfect Chemistry like I love sugar: I know that there are so many little things about it which aren’t great for me but the tide of goodness is overwhelming and it’s dragging me under into its deliciously depraved depths with no hope of getting rid of it.

I read Perfect Chemistry in April and it’s taken me this long to write a review for it because it’s taken me this long to dig myself out of being convinced that I had absolutely nothing to say that was worth saying, or anything to say that hadn’t already been said before and said better (read that aloud three times whilst drunk and I’ll buy you a beer myself). I have come to the conclusion that I do ultimately have things to say but that I don’t necessarily think said things are going to be popular.

Books about gang kids are a big instant hit with me. I will read them all, whether written well or rendered poorly, just because they exist. That isn’t a merit of mine. For example, the only other genre I have such absolutely devoted blinkers to is the world of the soulless thriller, the kind where you know who the baddie is by page five but you still keep reading because the satisfaction of knowing that the (usually chauvinistically male) protagonist eventually catches the baddie is worth ten times the pain of the cheese-tastic dialogue. Loving books about gang kids doesn’t make me any better than loving poor reproductions of James Bond. In my defence, however, I also love books about minorities, specifically Hispanic and Latino kids, and these books I am a huge advocate for. In fact, I shout more loudly about those books than any other and I tend to not only dismiss badly written renditions of these particular minorities but also to throw them on the kindling pile with sour (and loudly expressed) words of derision should the very harsh reality of these kids’ lives not be addressed. Which is why this review is so very difficult for me to write.

I came to Perfect Chemistry on the back of a fantastic example of the people impacted by the gang life in a Hispanic and Latino community. In March, I had read What Can’t Wait by Ashley Hope Peréz and then we interviewed her for the blog. It is hard to express how much I love that book. That book proves that such story can be well done. That it is possible to make these story heartfelt as well as brutally honest and bitingly critical of a society which fosters this system. So, admittedly, I came to Perfect Chemistry with a lot of trepidation.

Most of it that trepidation, I swiftly discovered, was wholly unwarranted. If Simone Elkeles is anything, she is brave. In Perfect Chemistry, she made the bold choice to tell a story which had the potential to be controversial at best and ill-received at worst. There are explicit scenes of violence and sexual situations, there is a myriad of cussing in both languages, there is the objectification of women (and men!) and there is the horrifyingly uncomfortable reality of the gang life: there is no easy out and there are no easy answers. Simple solutions are a rare as winning lottery tickets. For this alone, this book is worth reading. And cherishing. And passing on to other people who will read-and-cherish it.

Furthermore, I have a love affair with Alex. I love his spunk, I love his bull-headedness. I love his fear and his front and the moments where he’s nothing but a terrified kid who needs someone to help him out of where he is. I loved his loyalty and his bravery and his horrible choices and his determination to see the course of his actions through to the end. I loved his sexuality and that it was part of him and his culture and that it factored into everything: the way he identified as a man, the way he identified other people, the way he thought about relationships. Finally, I loved the sucker-punch to the gut that was his humbleness and his inferiority and I loved the way that he forced Brittany to deal with these parts of his life.

But see, that’s where the problem lies. Because I have such problems with Brittany. It’s funny because it took me to halfway through book two of the series to realise this. In fact, in the post-book haze, when I told Kate she had to read this, I actually told her (with words from my own mouth) I did like Brittany and that it wasn’t as bad as the first few chapters indicated it might be. But it took me thinking about the book critically to realise that, outside of Alex’s investment in her, I couldn’t for the life of me tell anyone why I liked her.

Sure, she starts out spunky and knowing her mind, but I had the same problem as Kate with her voice. It sounds off and contrived and badly placed; it isn’t a patch on Kiara in the second book. It isn’t a patch on some romance characters from some very trashy pseudo-plot romances I could name, either. It’s just… well, bad. And normally, I couldn’t overlook something like clunky dialogue but the problem is that is mysteriously clears up the minute she’s talking with Alex. She turns into a person when she’s with Alex and I think that’s where the parting of ways happened in the back of my consciousness. I did not love Brittany’s choices and I did not love the tokenism of her disabled sister. I did not love the way she initially treated Alex (or, actually, the way she treated men) and I did not love the way she treated her friends. Brittany, if she were real, would be one of those people that you always prefer to see in company because otherwise she reaches undeniable levels of snotty superiority. A little selflessness is nice – outright showy altruism is, er, less so.

Normally, I’d review a book with such a big flaw (BRITTANY!) and tell people that I wouldn’t recommend it but that’s the strange thing about Perfect Chemistry. I don’t think anything’s lacking in the book, as Kate does. Rather, I just believe that Brittany is not my kind of person, on or off the page. She is, however, other people‘s kind of person (note: in the interests of being fair, Alex is sometimes not everyone’s kind of person) and there is simply too much good in Perfect Chemistry and its sequel (which bests it by x100) to pass up just because it has a slightly naff cover and a whiny girl in it. I could name a hundred other books with similar slightly naff covers and whiny girls (cough) that shouldn’t be set aside because of that one little flaw.

Don’t set Perfect Chemistry aside. Give it a chance.

7 double-stuff oreos: A book that comes with high recommendations.

(For more rating information see here.)

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 29 other followers